THE
UNORIGINAL JOHN DARBY
by Dave MacPherson
Go ahead.
I dare you. Type in the name "John Darby" on Yahoo and other internet
"search engines."
You will
find that many still assume that this 19th century leader of the evangelical,
Britain-based Plymouth Brethren was the most important figure in the
development of "premillennial dispensationalism" - or, if you like
choices, "dispensational premillennialism." (Those fond of brevity
can call it "d-ism.")
Just for
the fun of it, let's list the chief features of d-ism (after listing what
supposedly led to those features) and see if Darby was the first person to
teach them:
(1) The
"Heavenly" Church.
This was
the theme of Darby's first paper (1827). PRE-DARBY DATA: Manuel Lacunza
(1812) and Edward Irving (1825-1827 sermons and other writings) had the same
theme.
(2) The
"Unity" of the Church.
This was
the theme of Darby's second paper (1828). PRE-DARBY DATA: Lacunza (1812)
and Irving (1825-27 sermons, etc.) had the same theme.
(3) The
Church/Israel "Distinction."
In his
1965 d-ism book, Darby defender Charles Ryrie viewed this distinction as the
most important basis for d-ism, adding in his 1981 rapture book that it led
Darby to his church/Israel "dichotomy," that is, a pretrib rapture
separating the two groups during a future tribulation.
As
support for this distinction, d-ists see several supposedly original thoughts
in Darby's 1829 paper:
Darby
spoke of "the Jewish and Gentile dispensations." PRE-DARBY DATA: Irving
(1825 etc.) referred to "the dispensations both Jewish and Gentile."
Darby
said "the hope of the church is His coming." PRE-DARBY DATA:
Irving (1825 etc.) stated that "the coming of the Lord" is the
church's "hope and desire."
Darby
wrote "looking daily for the Lord's coming." PRE-DARBY DATA: Irving
(1826 - Lacunza preface) wrote "look daily for the coming of the
Lord."
Darby
said "the church...was a suffering church" before "the church
became triumphant." PRE-DARBY DATA: Irving (1825 etc.) referred to
"the suffering church" before it became "the triumphant
church."
Darby
mentioned "the restoration of the Jews to their own land." PRE-DARBY
DATA: Irving (1825 etc.) mentioned the "restoration" of "the
Jews...to their own land."
(4) The
Gentile "Parenthesis."
In an
1830 article Darby talked about "the Jewish church or nation (exclusive of
the Gentile parenthesis...)." PRE-DARBY DATA: In an 1811 book (which was
reprinted in England in 1818, had several editions, and was widely read),
American pastor William Davis referred to "the Jewish nation, exclusively
of the Gentiles."
(5) The
Pretribulation "Rapture."
Like many
d-ists today, Darby saw Rev. 3's "Philadelphia" raptured and
"Laodicea" left behind. In an 1833 letter he wrote that this view
"commends itself morally to one's mind." PRE-DARBY DATA: As early as
Sep., 1830 Irving's journal stated that the "Philadelphia" church
(that is, church members then living) would be raptured BEFORE "the great
tribulation" while "Laodicea" would be left behind. (Three
months later, while still defending the posttrib view in a published article,
Darby said he expected to be raptured eventually at Christ's "judging of
the nations" - which Scofield puts in a posttrib setting!)
Anyone
can go through Darby's writings in the early 1830's and observe that he had NO
clear pretrib teaching or any church/Israel distinction (or anything else) that
could have led to pretrib doctrine:
In 1832
he couldn't have been pretrib because he was still rejecting the idea of a
"future" Antichrist and continuing to emphasize "the present
antichristian principles"!
In his
1834 works we find him waiting for the "second coming" (and not a
prior rapture) and waiting (with "the Jews"!) for the day when Christ
"will not tarry" (Heb. 10:37) - what Scofield terms the "second
advent"!
As late
as 1837, while being anything but "dichotomous," he saw the church
"going in with Him to the marriage, to wit, with Jerusalem and the
Jews"!
In 1839 he
finally had some clear pretrib teaching. His rapture, however, was based on the
symbol of the catching up of Rev. 12's "man child," and his
tribulation was then only 3.5 years long - a "chart" he embraced for
several more decades!
PRE-DARBY
DATA: But Irving had taught the same thing as early as the June, 1831 issue of
his journal when he stated that Rev. 12:5's "child" portrays a
rapture before "the travailing woman is cast out into the wilderness"
for 3.5 years!
My book The
Rapture Plot (available at armageddonbooks.com) shows, with exacting
documentation, that Darby wasn't first on ANY aspect of d-ism - the ones
already discussed as well as the ruin of the church, the dispensations, literal
interpretation, a primarily "Jewish" tribulation, etc.
Although
I view Darby as a brother in Christ, I'm forced to conclude that his great
weakness was his clever plagiarism of others!
If you
are disturbed by the false claims for Darby that have long been repeated (and
plagiarized) in d-ist writings, I invite you to send a copy of "The
Unoriginal John Darby" to those writers.
It'll be
your way of testing their fairness and honesty!